Solar Panel Comparison
JA Solar Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W vs Renogy 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase
The Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W delivers 410W, 210W more than the 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase at 200W.
200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase has a higher efficiency of 22.5% versus 21% for the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W.
They use different cell technologies: Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W uses Mono PERC MBB Half-Cell, while 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase uses Grade A+ Monocrystalline.
On price, the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W is cheaper by £87.99.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
JA Solar
Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W
410W
21% efficiency
Renogy
200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase
200W
22.5% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W | 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 410 W | 200 W |
| Efficiency | 21% | 22.5% |
| Cell Type | Mono PERC MBB Half-Cell | Grade A+ Monocrystalline |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.35 %/°C | — |
| Number of Cells | 108 | — |
| Bifacial | No | No |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | 37.32 V | 24.3 V |
| Vmp | 31.45 V | 20.4 V |
| Isc | 13.95 A | 10.42 A |
| Imp | 13.04 A | 9.82 A |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 600 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1722x1134x30 mm | 904x657x79 (folded) mm |
| Weight | 19.5 kg | 16.3 kg |
| Frame Colour | Black | Black |
| Connector Type | MC4-EVO2A | MC4 |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | — |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 12 years | — |
| Power Warranty | 25 years linear (0.55%/yr) | 5yr/95% 10yr/90% 25yr/80% |
| MCS Certified | Yes | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730, UL 61215, UL 61730, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001 | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | £62.00 | £149.99 |
| Price per Watt | £0.151/W | £0.750/W |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W or the 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase?
The 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase is more efficient at 22.5%, compared to 21% for the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W or the 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase?
The Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W has a higher rated output at 410W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase.
Is the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W or 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase better value for money?
The Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W is priced lower at £62.00 per panel, saving £87.99 per panel. However, value depends on the full system cost, efficiency, and warranty — use our solar cost calculator to compare total installation costs.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W or the 200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
JA Solar
Deep Blue 3.0 Light 410W
410W · 21% efficiency · Mono PERC MBB Half-Cell
View full specs →Renogy
200W 12V Monocrystalline Foldable Solar Suitcase
200W · 22.5% efficiency · Grade A+ Monocrystalline
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.