Solar Panel Comparison
Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass vs Maxeon / SunPower Maxeon 6 DC 440W
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass delivers 510W, 70W more than the Maxeon 6 DC 440W at 440W.
Maxeon 6 DC 440W has a higher efficiency of 22.8% versus 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
They use different cell technologies: Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0, while Maxeon 6 DC 440W uses IBC (Interdigitated Back Contact).
On price, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass is cheaper by £574.08.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W
22.5% efficiency
Maxeon / SunPower
Maxeon 6 DC 440W
440W
22.8% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass | Maxeon 6 DC 440W |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 510 W | 440 W |
| Efficiency | 22.5% | 22.8% |
| Cell Type | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 | IBC (Interdigitated Back Contact) |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.29 %/°C | -0.29 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 108 | 66 |
| Bifacial | Yes | No |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | — | 48.2 V |
| Vmp | — | 40.5 V |
| Isc | — | 11.58 A |
| Imp | — | 10.87 A |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1000 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 1872x1032x40 mm |
| Weight | — | 20.9 kg |
| Frame Colour | Black | Black |
| Connector Type | MC4 | EVO2 |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | IP68 |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 15 years | 25 years |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear | 25 years / 92% (extendable to 40yr) |
| MCS Certified | No | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 | IEC 61215, IEC 61730, UL 61730, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, IEC 62716, IEC 61701, MIL-STD-810G |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | £75.92 | £650.00 |
| Price per Watt | £0.149/W | £1.477/W |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Maxeon 6 DC 440W?
The Maxeon 6 DC 440W is more efficient at 22.8%, compared to 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Maxeon 6 DC 440W?
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass has a higher rated output at 510W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the Maxeon 6 DC 440W.
Is the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or Maxeon 6 DC 440W better value for money?
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass is priced lower at £75.92 per panel, saving £574.08 per panel. However, value depends on the full system cost, efficiency, and warranty — use our solar cost calculator to compare total installation costs.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Maxeon 6 DC 440W?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0
View full specs →Maxeon / SunPower
Maxeon 6 DC 440W
440W · 22.8% efficiency · IBC (Interdigitated Back Contact)
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.