Solar Panel Comparison
Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass vs Risen Energy Titan Bifacial 540W
The Titan Bifacial 540W delivers 540W, 30W more than the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass at 510W.
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass has a higher efficiency of 22.5% versus 20.7% for the Titan Bifacial 540W.
They use different cell technologies: Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0, while Titan Bifacial 540W uses Mono PERC Half-Cut Bifacial.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W
22.5% efficiency
Risen Energy
Titan Bifacial 540W
540W
20.7% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass | Titan Bifacial 540W |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 510 W | 540 W |
| Efficiency | 22.5% | 20.7% |
| Cell Type | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 | Mono PERC Half-Cut Bifacial |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.29 %/°C | -0.25 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 108 | 110 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | — | 37.88 V |
| Vmp | — | 31.56 V |
| Isc | — | 18.13 A |
| Imp | — | 17.12 A |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1500 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 2384x1096x30 mm |
| Weight | — | 34 kg |
| Frame Colour | Black | — |
| Connector Type | MC4 | MC4 |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | — |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 15 years | 12 years |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear | 30 years |
| MCS Certified | No | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 | IEC 62941, ISO 45001 |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | £75.92 | — |
| Price per Watt | £0.149/W | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Titan Bifacial 540W?
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass is more efficient at 22.5%, compared to 20.7% for the Titan Bifacial 540W. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Titan Bifacial 540W?
The Titan Bifacial 540W has a higher rated output at 540W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Titan Bifacial 540W?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0
View full specs →Risen Energy
Titan Bifacial 540W
540W · 20.7% efficiency · Mono PERC Half-Cut Bifacial
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.