Solar Panel Comparison
Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 vs Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial
The Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial delivers 470W, 10W more than the Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 at 460W.
Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 has a higher efficiency of 23% versus 21.8% for the Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial.
They use different cell technologies: Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 Half-Cut, while Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial uses N-type TOPCon.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0
460W
23% efficiency
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial
470W
21.8% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 | Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 460 W | 470 W |
| Efficiency | 23% | 21.8% |
| Cell Type | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 Half-Cut | N-type TOPCon |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.29 %/°C | -0.3 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 96 | 120 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | 36.38 V | 42.37 V |
| Vmp | 30.71 V | 35.04 V |
| Isc | 15.91 A | 14.15 A |
| Imp | 14.98 A | 13.41 A |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1500 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1762x1134x30 mm | 1903x1134x30 mm |
| Weight | 24 kg | 24.2 kg |
| Frame Colour | Black | Black |
| Connector Type | JK03M | MC4 |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | — |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 25 | 25 |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear (0.4%/yr) | 30 years linear (0.40%/yr) |
| MCS Certified | Yes | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730, CE | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 or the Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial?
The Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 is more efficient at 23%, compared to 21.8% for the Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 or the Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial?
The Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial has a higher rated output at 470W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0 or the Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 460W Black Frame Dual Glass TOPCon HOT 3.0
460W · 23% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 Half-Cut
View full specs →Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 470W Black Frame N-Type TOPCon Bifacial
470W · 21.8% efficiency · N-type TOPCon
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.