Solar Panel Comparison
AIKO Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 vs Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
Both panels are rated at 510W.
Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 has a higher efficiency of 23% versus 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
They use different cell technologies: Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 uses N-type ABC (All-Back Contact), while Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0.
On price, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass is cheaper by £2.60.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
AIKO
Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2
510W
23% efficiency
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W
22.5% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 | Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 510 W | 510 W |
| Efficiency | 23% | 22.5% |
| Cell Type | N-type ABC (All-Back Contact) | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.26 %/°C | -0.29 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 120 | 108 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | 45.32 V | — |
| Vmp | 38.2 V | — |
| Isc | 14.23 A | — |
| Imp | 13.49 A | — |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1500 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1954x1134x30 mm | 1961x1134x30 mm |
| Weight | 27.2 kg | — |
| Frame Colour | Black | Black |
| Connector Type | MC4 EVO2 | MC4 |
| Junction Box IP | — | IP68 |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 25 | 15 years |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear | 30 years linear |
| MCS Certified | Yes | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | £78.52 | £75.92 |
| Price per Watt | £0.154/W | £0.149/W |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 or the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass?
The Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 is more efficient at 23%, compared to 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 or the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass?
Both panels are rated at the same output of 510W.
Is the Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 or Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass better value for money?
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass is priced lower at £75.92 per panel, saving £2.60 per panel. However, value depends on the full system cost, efficiency, and warranty — use our solar cost calculator to compare total installation costs.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2 or the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
AIKO
Neostar 2S+ 510W Dual Glass All Black Gen 2
510W · 23% efficiency · N-type ABC (All-Back Contact)
View full specs →Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.