Solar Panel Comparison
AIKO Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 vs Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass delivers 510W, 25W more than the Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 at 485W.
Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 has a higher efficiency of 24.3% versus 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
They use different cell technologies: Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 uses N-type ABC (All-Back Contact), while Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
AIKO
Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3
485W
24.3% efficiency
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W
22.5% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 | Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 485 W | 510 W |
| Efficiency | 24.3% | 22.5% |
| Cell Type | N-type ABC (All-Back Contact) | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.26 %/°C | -0.29 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 108 | 108 |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | 41 V | — |
| Vmp | 34.3 V | — |
| Isc | 14.88 A | — |
| Imp | 14.15 A | — |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1500 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1757x1134x30 mm | 1961x1134x30 mm |
| Frame Colour | Black | Black |
| Connector Type | MC4 EVO2 | MC4 |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | IP68 |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 15 | 15 years |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear | 30 years linear |
| MCS Certified | Yes | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730, TUV | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | — | £75.92 |
| Price per Watt | — | £0.149/W |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 or the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass?
The Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 is more efficient at 24.3%, compared to 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 or the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass?
The Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass has a higher rated output at 510W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3 or the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
AIKO
Neostar 3P 485W Black Frame ABC Gen 3
485W · 24.3% efficiency · N-type ABC (All-Back Contact)
View full specs →Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.