Solar Panel Comparison
Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass vs LONGi Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial
The Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial delivers 580W, 70W more than the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass at 510W.
Both panels share the same 22.5% efficiency rating.
They use different cell technologies: Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0, while Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial uses N-type HPDC 182mm.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W
22.5% efficiency
LONGi
Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial
580W
22.5% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass | Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 510 W | 580 W |
| Efficiency | 22.5% | 22.5% |
| Cell Type | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 | N-type HPDC 182mm |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.29 %/°C | -0.28 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 108 | 144 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | — | 51.41 V |
| Vmp | — | 43.22 V |
| Isc | — | 14.22 A |
| Imp | — | 13.42 A |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1500 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 2278x1134x30 mm |
| Weight | — | 31.8 kg |
| Frame Colour | Black | Silver |
| Connector Type | MC4 | MC4 |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | IP68 |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 15 years | 12 years |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear | 30 years linear (0.4%/yr) |
| MCS Certified | No | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 | IEC 61215, IEC 61730, CE, CB, ISO 9001 |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | £75.92 | — |
| Price per Watt | £0.149/W | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial?
Both the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass and Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial have the same efficiency rating of 22.5%.
Which panel produces more power, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial?
The Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial has a higher rated output at 580W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0
View full specs →LONGi
Hi-MO 7 580W Bifacial
580W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type HPDC 182mm
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.