Solar Panel Comparison
Jinko Solar Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass vs LONGi Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W
The Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W delivers 610W, 100W more than the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass at 510W.
Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W has a higher efficiency of 22.8% versus 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
They use different cell technologies: Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass uses N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0, while Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W uses N-type HPDC 144-cut.
Here's how they compare across all key specifications.
Spec
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W
22.5% efficiency
LONGi
Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W
610W
22.8% efficiency
Full Specification Comparison
| Spec | Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass | Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Power Output | 510 W | 610 W |
| Efficiency | 22.5% | 22.8% |
| Cell Type | N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0 | N-type HPDC 144-cut |
| Temp. Coeff. | -0.29 %/°C | -0.28 %/°C |
| Number of Cells | 108 | 144 |
| Bifacial | Yes | Yes |
| Electrical | ||
| Voc | — | 48.38 V |
| Vmp | — | 40.51 V |
| Isc | — | 15.95 A |
| Imp | — | 15.06 A |
| Max System Voltage | 1500 V | 1500 V |
| Operating Temp | -40 to +85 °C | -40 to +85 °C |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 1961x1134x30 mm | 2382x1134x30 mm |
| Weight | — | 33.5 kg |
| Frame Colour | Black | Silver |
| Connector Type | MC4 | — |
| Junction Box IP | IP68 | — |
| Warranty & Certification | ||
| Product Warranty | 15 years | 25 years |
| Power Warranty | 30 years linear | 30 years (87.4% yr30) |
| MCS Certified | No | No |
| Certifications | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 | IEC 61215, IEC 61730 |
| Pricing (UK) | ||
| Retail Price | £75.92 | — |
| Price per Watt | £0.149/W | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more efficient, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W?
The Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W is more efficient at 22.8%, compared to 22.5% for the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass. Higher efficiency means more power generated per square metre of roof space.
Which panel produces more power, the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W?
The Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W has a higher rated output at 610W. This means fewer panels would be needed to reach the same system size compared to the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass.
Which solar panel should I choose for my home — the Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass or the Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W?
The right choice depends on your priorities. If maximising energy generation per panel is key, consider efficiency and wattage. If budget is your main concern, compare price per watt. Both panels have their merits — use our Solar Estimator to see how each would perform in your specific home setup.
Jinko Solar
Tiger Neo 2.0 510W Bifacial Dual Glass
510W · 22.5% efficiency · N-type TOPCon HOT 3.0
View full specs →LONGi
Hi-MO 7 Bifacial 610W
610W · 22.8% efficiency · N-type HPDC 144-cut
View full specs →More Comparisons
See how these panels perform in your home
Use our Solar Estimator to calculate system size, installation cost, and payback period — with either of these panels as a starting point.